Article Response

This article raises a lot of questions in my mind. I find the concept of abstract photography extremely interesting, if not a bit weird. The article talks about different types of photography and the mediums it uses. Some of which are "camera-less". What separates this from regular art? The line between photography and other forms of art seems to be getting more and more blurry. I have always thought of a photograph as something, at the most basic level, as a piece of art made with a camera. Now even that seems to be changing! I don't know whether to find this scary or exciting.